The layout is pretty close to how you should kind of work through it. The sliders are responsive, clearly labeled, and look good across their range. Rawtherapee has a bit better layout of the tools, but it's still confusing and some changes only appear at 1:1, and is missing stuff in DT and LR. This would seem to be better because you get more control, but it means it's simply harder to get good results. They ofthen have multiple sliders to dial in a correction LR does with 1 slider. Their problems are usability.ĭarktable is the worse. So, feature-wise DT and RT are head of LR. Lightroom is "light-years" ahead of DT and Rawthereapee.
#GIMP DARKTABLE TUTORIAL FREE#
Seems like most people use Lightroom and was wondering what features they have that the free ones don't? It's just that your random chance that an interesting tutorial is based on LT and not DT are much higher, so you have to translate and try to replicate the effect as best as you can. There are also a few video tutorials that do exist. I very much appreciate the work that went into DT from the deep math and technologic knowledge behind it to the effort put into explaining things to users. It's immensely helpful and a lot of work went into that.
#GIMP DARKTABLE TUTORIAL PDF#
There is a fat PDF out there that explains all the modules and what they do. I've never tried if commercially bought presets/plugins etc would be transferable to DT but I highly doubt it, since the logic that powers DT seems to have been developed completely independently and not modeled on LR.ĭT actually has very good and readable user documentation, especially for a FOSS program. You can also use them to batch edit many pictures at once. You can save your own presets in DT and apply them to other pictures. Still, I keep wondering how much better my photos could be if I knew better what I was doing and learn by precisely replicating tutorials instead of guesstimating what I do. I love the look and the workflow and that it works seamlessly with my equipment. I love DT, it's hugely powerful and has an enormous amount of modules. I got used to DT over RT initially because I preferred the interface and it was closer to LR so I could better profit from the wealth of information out there. Especially the famous clarity tool in LR doesn't exist in DT as such, and sliders will have different values and/or be called differently although they may do the same. If you try to achieve a certain effect and you follow the tutorials you find but the results aren't there, you never know if your picture isn't good enough, you're too dumb, the tutorial is dumb or if it's down to differences in the software. One thing that is almost worth paying for Lightroom is that every effing tutorial out there, be it YouTube, books or random websites, is based on Lightroom.
Now, while Photoshop has the nicer interface and some tools are better integrated, GIMP's menus and workflow seem much more logical and natural to me and I prefer it now.
#GIMP DARKTABLE TUTORIAL WINDOWS#
I grew up on Photoshop and hated GIMP's interface, but eventually I became too lazy to reboot into Windows and got used to GIMP. Just as with Photoshop and GIMP, there is a huge habit aspect to it. Personally I use Darktable on Linux and am quite happy with it.
0 kommentar(er)
